Tell us what you need to pack — call 01494 623015 for practical machine advice
Product presentation

Flow-wrapper feeding systems: manual, flighted and automatic

The wrapper can only make consistent packs when products arrive at the right orientation, spacing and time. Select the feeding method around real product behaviour and line output.

Infeed and product-spacing guideHorizontal flow wrapping process

Feeding controls the product pitch before the film and jaws

Horizontal flow wrapping is a timed process. The infeed must present each product or group inside the intended bag length and clear of the transverse sealing zone. Product pitch is therefore a line-control requirement, not simply a conveyor setting.

The best infeed depends on product rigidity, surface friction, shape, orientation, arrival pattern, required output and the amount of manual handling that is acceptable. A wrapper described as automatic may still rely on people to place products into flighted pockets unless automatic feeding is included explicitly.

Common feeding methods

Manual loading into a flighted or lugged conveyor

An operator places each product between flights. The mechanical pitch is clear and flexible, making this approach useful for variable products, lower output or applications where visual judgement is valuable. Labour demand, ergonomics and missed pockets must be assessed over the intended shift.

Metering belts or inline transfer

Products arriving in a stable orientation can be accelerated, separated and phased into the wrapper. The transfer must manage touching products, gaps, speed changes and stop/restart behaviour without scuffing or damaging the product.

Collating and multipack feeding

Several items may need to be counted, stacked or grouped before they enter the film. The system should verify the group before release and define what happens to incomplete groups during a stop or fault.

Automatic feeders, robots and vision-guided handling

Random or high-output products may require orientation, pick-and-place or a purpose-built feeder. The project must define the feeder’s usable input condition, missed-pick logic, reject route, recovery method and responsibility for product accumulation.

Design for starved, blocked and imperfect conditions

A line that works only with evenly spaced ideal products is not production-ready. Define how the wrapper reacts when no product arrives, when two products touch, when a product is late, when the downstream conveyor stops and when an operator removes a damaged item. Sensors and controls should prevent empty packs or product being caught in the jaws where that function is required and verified.

Selection aid

Match the infeed to the product arrival condition

Flow-wrapper feeding concepts
Arrival conditionFeeding approach to assessImportant trial evidence
Variable products presented by an operatorManual loading into a flighted conveyor.Ergonomics, sustainable loading rate, missed pockets and stop/restart handling.
Stable products arriving in one laneMetering belts or phased inline transfer.Separation, surface marks, speed transitions and response to touching products.
Products requiring counted groupsCollator, stacker or grouping device.Count verification, incomplete-group rejection and group stability through the former.
Random orientation or mixed arrivalPurpose-built feeder, vision system or robotic handling.Input limits, orientation success, reject recovery and accumulation control.
Soft, sticky or difficult-to-push productsAssess an inverted or bottom-film architecture as well as the feeder.Product support, transfer points, film contact, seal position and cleaning access.
Representative infeed trial

Test the difficult arrival patterns, not only a perfect queue

Product variation

Include minimum, maximum and nominal sizes, normal surface variation, deformed products and any item likely to roll, bounce, stick or overlap.

Line conditions

Run start-up, normal operation, short gaps, touching products, upstream starvation, downstream blockage and controlled restart.

Accepted result

Record product position in the pack, seal clearance, damage, empty-pack policy, rejected groups and sustainable good-pack output.

Separate wrapper capability from loading capability

Use the trial and acceptance guide to state whether the test includes manual loading, a temporary feeder or the final integrated infeed.

Specify the product path

Send video of product arrival as well as product samples

Dimensions alone do not show how products arrive, separate and recover after a stop. A short production video, line speed and representative samples make the feeding review more useful.

Questions buyers ask about product feeding

Choose the infeed around real product arrival

The wrapper can only make repeatable packs when products reach the film and sealing section in a controlled orientation and at a usable pitch.

When is manual loading still a sensible choice?

Manual loading can be sensible when the required sustained rate is compatible with safe, consistent operator presentation and the product does not justify a complex automatic feeder. The assessment must include staffing, reach, repetitive handling, product variation, breaks, changeover and the effect of occasional missed pockets.

A representative timed trial should prove the achievable good-pack rate. The wrapper’s cycle capability alone does not show that an operator can maintain the required pitch.

What is the difference between spacing products and orientating products?

Spacing sets the distance and timing between products; orientation controls which face, edge or direction leads into the wrapper. A metering system may create regular gaps while leaving an incorrectly rotated product unchanged. Conversely, an orientator may turn products correctly but still need a separate stage to establish pitch.

Describe the arrival condition before specifying equipment: random or queued, single-file or bulk, correctly orientated or mixed, touching or separated, stable or easily disturbed.

How should a feeder respond when the wrapper stops?

A feeder should stop, hold or divert products in a controlled way that prevents collisions, overfilling and unsafe manual recovery. The chosen response depends on product stability, available accumulation, restart behaviour and whether products can remain in the feeder without damage or quality loss.

Define the ready, run, starved, blocked and fault signals with the line-integration interface. Test the stop and restart sequence with product present, not only with an empty conveyor.

Why should the worst product-arrival pattern be tested?

The worst credible arrival pattern exposes feeding risk that a perfect demonstration queue can hide. Bursts, gaps, touching products, skewed items, variable surfaces and minor size changes may challenge metering, orientation and jaw clearance even when nominal samples run well.

Record the difficult condition on video and include it in the trial material set. The product-pitch guide explains how arrival control connects to sealing clearance and pack repeat.

Feeding a controlled group

Questions about multipack collation and recovery

What is the difference between feeding and collation?

Feeding moves products towards the wrapper; collation creates the required count, pattern or stack. A line may feed individual products reliably but still need a dedicated collator before it can make a repeatable multipack.

Can multipacks be loaded manually?

Yes, where output, ergonomics and change frequency make manual group formation practical. The operator must still create a consistent count and orientation, place the group at the correct pitch and work within the safe loading arrangement.

What should an automatic multipack line do after a missing product?

The response must be defined in the controls specification. The line may reject the incomplete group, create an empty pitch, stop and wait, or recover through a buffer. The chosen method must preserve pack identity and avoid an incorrect count reaching the customer.

How should a multipack infeed be tested?

Use the real product range and intended group, then test normal arrivals, gaps, doubles, misorientation, upstream starvation, blocked discharge, stops, restarts and sustained accepted output. Record the group count and pack result, not only the wrapper cycle rate.

Read the complete multipack and collation guide

Ready to discuss your product?

Share your product, pack size, film and target output for a practical machine recommendation.